The Hon'ble Court dispensed with hearing due to the non-appearance of the revisionist's counsel, resulting in the dismissal of the revision petition for want of prosecution on 5.7.2019.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 306 of 2002
Revisionist :- Sunil Kumar Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,A.S.C. 2002/416,B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 5.7.2019 HSM
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
