Mahmood Khan and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision dismissed by the High Court on 8.7.2019 due to the absence of the revisionist's counsel, resulting in want of prosecution.
Revision dismissed by the High Court on 8.7.2019 due to the absence of the revisionist's counsel, resulting in want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 231 of 2001
Revisionist :- Mahmood Khan And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashok K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionists is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 8.7.2019 HSM
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court