Revision dismissed and delay condonation application rejected due to insufficient and untruthful explanations for delay in filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 277 of 2001
Revisionist :- Mahak Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.R Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S.S.Shukla
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The explanation given by the revisionist for condoning the delay is neither sufficient nor truthful.
Accordingly, delay condonation application is rejected.
Since the delay application has been rejected, the revision is also dismissed.
Order Date :- 10.7.2019 RPD
Mahak Singh
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
