The High Court dismissed a Criminal Revision appeal for want of prosecution as the revisionist failed to appear on thedate called for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1601 of 2003
Revisionist :- Dr. Laxmi Kant Nigam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- L.M. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one appears for the revisionist.
The revision is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.7.2019 RPD
Dr. Laxmi Kant Nigam
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
