In a criminal revision filed for non-prosecution, the High Court observed procedural delay and absence of the applicant, leading to rejection of the delay condonation application and dismissal of the revision as time-barred.
Rejection of delay condonation application and dismissal of revision; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 270 of 2002
Revisionist :- Naurangi Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.B. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.D.Singh
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised. Revisionist or his counsel is not present. Learned A.G.A. is present.
As per office report, there is delay in filing the revision.
In the light of the above, Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application is, hereby rejected for non prosecution. Revision is also dismissed as being time barred.
Let it be consigned to the record.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be communicated to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Vibha Singh
Naurangi Lal
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
