Smt. Amir Bano v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant, and vacated any interim order.
The Hon'ble Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant, and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6569 of 2004
Applicant :- Smt. Amir Bano Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Sharma,Bhawesh Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sumit Goyal,Swetashwa Agarwal
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised. None present for the applicant to press this case. Sri Raj Kumar Kanaujia, Advcoate holding brief of Sri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be transmitted to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019
A. Pt. Singh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Amir Bano
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court