The Single Judge dismissed a criminal revision for want of prosecution as the revisionist was absent and failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 258 of 2002
Revisionist :- Smt. Sheetal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List has been revised.
None present for the revisionist to press the revision.
The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be communicated to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Vibha Singh
Smt. Sheetal
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
