Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 440 of 2004…
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 440 of 2004
Revisionist :- Lakshaman Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Onkar Nath,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionist. Learned A.G.A. representing the opposite party No. 1 is present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.7.2019 HSM
Lakshaman Singh Yadav
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
State Not Available
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
