Dismissed
Grish v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/33522/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The bail application filed in 2016 was dismissed as infructuous because it was pending since 2016. None appeared to press the application in the revised hearing held in 2019. This rendered the application infructuous.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33522 of 2016
¶3
Applicant :- Grish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Prakash Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2016. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶7
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶8
Order Date :- 3.7.2019 KA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Grish
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/33522/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court