Dismissed
Rohit v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/35737/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application to enlarge accused on bail in a gang rape case. Court dismissed bail application as it is not a fit case given victim's support of FIR.
What did the court decide?
Application to enlarge accused on bail dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35737 of 2016
¶3
Applicant :- Rohit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Saxena, Advocate for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
¶6
- The present bail application has been moved by accusedapplicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No. 610 of 2016, under Sections 366, 376, 506 IPC, Police Station Kuthaund, District Jalaun.
¶7
- In the First Information Report allegation of gang rape has been levelled and the victim has also supported version of First Information Report in her statement. I, therefore, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail.
¶8
- Application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 3.7.2019 AK
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving charges of gang rape.
Whether the allegations against the accused are well founded.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rohit
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/35737/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court