Revision No. 1245 of 2004 dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist's counsel was absent during the hearing on 15.7.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1245 of 2004
Revisionist :- Lakhan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Birendra Singh,Ajay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,I.K. Chaturvdi
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 15.7.2019 HSM
Lakhan Singh
State Of U.P. And Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
