A criminal revision filed in 2003 was listed in 2010 for admission, but the revisionist was absent on both occasions. The court dismissed the revision in default at the stage of admission due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2108 of 2003
Revisionist :- Kanhai Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None present even in the revised on behalf of revisionist. Learned A.G.A is present.
This revision is pertaining to year 2003. On 06.09.2010, this revision was listed and on that date also no one was present from the side of revisionist.
Since, none is present to press this revision and this revision is still awaiting admission, hence in absence of revisionist, the revision is dismissed in default at the stage of admission.
Order Date :- 6.12.2019 PS
Kanhai
State of U.P.
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
