Intezar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Multiple Criminal Misc. applications arose. The court rejected a delay condonation application before dismissing the pending criminal revision as time-barred.
What did the court decide?
The delay condonation application was rejected. The revision was dismissed as time-barred. The interim order was vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 388 of 2001
Revisionist :- Intezar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Raghuraj Kishore Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 120110 of 2001
None is present on behalf of the revisionist to press this delay condonation application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The appeal is pending for disposal since year 2001.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order on memo of Revision
As the delay condonation application has been rejected, vide order of the date.
Consequently, the revision is also dismissed as being time barred.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Intezar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRD/388/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court