The High Court granted Certii committal to the lower court. The judgment found no manifest error or illegality to justify interference in the criminal revision filed by the appellant challenging the conviction and sentencing order under the PFA Act.
Criminal Revision dismissed. Certii committal to lower Court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1493 of 1997
Revisionist :- Rama Kant Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K.Srivastava,K. Kapoor,R.B. Sahai,R.S. Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of conviction and sentence under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act warrants interference in criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rama Kant
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
