In this criminal revision, the Court perused the record as no one appeared. Finding no manifest error or illegality in the lower court's decision to allow maintenance, the revision was dismissed and any interim order vacated.
The criminal revision is dismissed; any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1267 of 1997
Revisionist :- Vinai Kumar
Opposite Party :- Addl.Principal Judge Family Court And Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Mayank Bhushan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 16.10.2019 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was any manifest error, illegality, or procedural impropriety in the impugned order to warrant interference in the criminal revision.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
