Held that there is no manifest error or illegality, procedural or otherwise, in the impugned order taking cognizance. Criminal revision dismissed with interim order vacated.
Revision dismissed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1326 of 1988
Revisionist :- P.M. And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.R. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any manifest error or illegality in the impugned order taking cognizance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
