Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal singly considered a criminal revision under CrPC challenging an acquittal. The court found no manifest error or illegality warranting interference.
Revision dismissed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1321 of 1988
Revisionist :- Ram Nath Opposite Party :- State And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Vinod Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
5.Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision should be allowed on account of manifest error or illegality.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAM NATH
STATE
SUDHIR AGARWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
