A single judge dismissed a criminal revision challenging an acquittal and conviction on the merits, finding no manifest error in the lower court's judgment after perusing the record.
The criminal revision was dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1231 of 1997
Revisionist :- Sundar Singh And Others Opposite Party :- The IIIrd A.S.Judge And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- A.P.S.Raghava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 11.9.2019 PS
Sundar Singh And Others
The IIIrd A.S.Judge And Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
