Rashid v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision No. 495 of 2004 before Court No. 28. The revisionist failed to appear, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
Criminal Revision No. 495 of 2004 before Court No. 28. The revisionist failed to appear, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 495 of 2004
Revisionist :- Rashid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.K. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears on behalf of revisionist.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.7.2019 Anil Sharma
Rashid
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court