The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9333 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Uzaif Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharique Ahmed Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J .
The list of additional cases has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the petition. On 12.04.2019 following order was passed:-
"Learned counsel for the petitioner shall seek instruction from his client whether he is willing to deposit the entire amount which, according to the allegations in the first information report, was wrongly credited to the account of the petitioner and thereafter withdrawn there from.
Put up this matter on Tuesday i.e. 16.04.2019. "
As no one has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the petition, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
O rder Date :- 16.4.2019 Vibha Singh
Mohd. Uzaif
State Of U.P.
Manoj Misra
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
