Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR under Section 366 IPC via a criminal writ petition. Court held that remedy lies before the concerned court since a charge sheet was filed and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1884 of 2019
Petitioner :- Azad Kumar @ Anil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subedar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 6.12.2019 PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the First Information Report after the charge sheet has been submitted.
Azad Kumar @ Anil Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
