The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed for quashing a cognizance FIR under Section 306 IPC, holding that with the submission of the charge sheet, the petitioners have an adequate remedy before the court concerned, rendering Article 226 non-applicable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1862 of 2019
Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 6.12.2019 Ashish Pd.
Chandra Prakash And 5 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
