In a recalled writ petition where no arguments were presented by the petitioner's counsel, the High Court dismissed the matter on the ground that the cause of action likely no longer survives or the matter has become infructuous, vacating any interim order.
The writ petition is dismissed and the interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6312 of 2006
Petitioner :- Islam Khan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 5.12.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Islam Khan
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
