In this criminal miscellaneous writ petition, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was not present to press the petition on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1374 of 2002
Petitioner :- Zahida Khatoon Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B. Ram,Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Bishram Tiwari
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised.
Sri Bhupendra Tiwari, advocate, holding brief of Sri Bishram Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
None is present for the petitioner to press the petition.
The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be communicated to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019
Vibha Singh
Zahida Khatoon
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
