The court noted the applicant did not appear to press the contempt application, observing that the basis of the allegation did not survive given the dismissal of an associated writ petition for non-prosecution.
Contempt application dismissed on the record of trivial appearance and supervening facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2447 of 2012 Applicant :- Shaukat Khan And Anr. Opposite Party :- Smt. Manisha Trighatiya Collector Jalaun Counsel for Applicant :- Daya Shankar Mishra,Punit Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this contempt application.
Learned standing counsel is present for the State respondents.
It prima-facie appears that very basis of the petitioner for allegation of contempt does not appear to be surviving in view of the interim order dated 10.5.2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 22080 of 2012.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.12.2019 Arif
Shaukat Khan And Anr.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
