Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated for committing dowry death with general allegations being mother-in-law of the deceased; that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating the deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that as per averments made in FIR lodged by Ram Bharose on 11.10.2017, his daughter Radha was married to Chandan about five years back and since after marriage was being treated with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of motorcycle and in the night of 9/10.10.2017 he was informed by neighbours of her matrimonial house that his daughter is in hospital following incident in which she was put to fire by her inlaws and when he reached at District Hospital, Lalitpur at about 11.00 a.m., he found dead body of his daughter in mortuary and his daughter survived with three years old son and was four months pregnant; that entire prosecution story is absolutely false and incorrect; that after lodging of FIR upon insistence of first informant applicant's husband Hariya executed a sale deed of 0.809 hectare land in favour of Vivek, three years old minor son of deceased on 20.11.2017 following which in their additional statement under Section 161, Cr.P.C. first informant and other witnesses stated that Radha committed suicide by immolating herself; that consequently final report was submitted, but subsequently upon application of first informant to S.P. during further investigation his statement under Section 164, Cr.P.C. was recorded on 28.5.2018 wherein he made a different statement that motorcycle given at the time of marriage was lost by husband of deceased during gamble and he
