Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being mother-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged on 17.10.2018 by Mohd. Islam, his sister Sabana was married to Ikrar about four years back and since after marriage, she was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of Rs.2,00,000/- and on 16.10.2018 she was shot dead for non fulfilment of demand of dowry; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Rs.2,00,000/allegedly demanded, as dowry; that post mortem report of deceased states that she died due to anti mortem fire arm injuries on her face, which is described as lacerated wound with blackening over left side of face with no exit wound and fracture on left side base of skull and multiple radio opaque shadows there; that deceased died of single fire arm wound and applicant did not make any fire on her; that during investigation co-accused Waseem, Dewar of deceased has confessed to have shot the deceased and recovery of fire arm has also been made on his pointing; that case of applicant is distinguishable from Waseem, the Dewar and Ikrar, the husband of deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that she will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 17.10.2018.
