Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being father-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged on 24.3.2018 by Ram Sajiwan after inordinate delay of over one and half months, his daughter Poonam was married to Sushil on 2.7.2016 and since after marriage, she was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of Motorcycle and was ousted from matrimonial house during her pregnancy and first informant got her delivery done and her son Vikas is aged about 07 months and after repeated requests, she was fetched by her in-laws in first week of February, 2018 on the pretext that motorcycle will be sent by first informant and on 23.2.2018, she was badly beaten and poisonous substance was administered to her; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Motorcycle allegedly demanded, as dowry; that as per post mortem report cause of death could not be ascertained, so viscera was preserved and as per viscera report para phenayline dye amin (DYE)/ poison was found in parts of her viscera; that post mortem report does not states any anti mortem injury on the body of deceased, which belies the allegations of beating her badly; that it appears that due to quarrel between husband and wife, deceased has committed suicide by consuming poisonous substance, for which husband may be responsible; that case of applicant is distinguishable from Sushil, the husband of deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 23.12.2018.
