The single judge rejected a bail application noting the petition was silent on apprehension of arrest. The application was filed after lower court rejection, and no foundation was laid for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53731 of 2019
Applicant :- Aakash Alias Rinku Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri I.P. Srivastava learned AGA.
The petition is completely silent with respect to the apprehension of the applicant against arrest. Although the FIR was registered on 16 July 2019, the present Court has been moved only after the rejection of the petition for anticipatory bail by the lower Court in September 2019. Apart from the nature of the allegations and since no foundation has been laid for the grant of anticipatory bail, the application is refused.
Order Date :- 6.12.2019 LA/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the complete silence regarding apprehension of arrest in the petition.
Whether foundation has been laid for the grant of bail despite rejection by the lower court.
Aakash Alias Rinku
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
