It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. As per the allegations made in the F.I.R., the applicant was involved in the manufacturing of illicit liquor. On information received by the informer, when the Police party raided, the applicant was arrested from the spot and, thereafter, 50 ltr. adulterated liquor, 1 kg. urea and other articles have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is next submitted that false recovery has been planted against applicant to implicate him in the offence, the said recovery has not been witnessed by any independent witness. Though the applicant was arrested from the spot but has nothing to do with the alleged recovery. It is next submitted that as per recovery memo, there is no mention whether recovered material is intended for sale or it is injurious to health. The applicant has no criminal history except the present case and is languishing in jail since 19.09.2019. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
