It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the first information report has been lodged on 17th October, 2018 by Ranno Devi mother of the victim, namely, Kumari Jyoti against as many as 14 named persons including the applicants i.e. after one and half months for which no plausible explanation has been given, which makes the prosecution case doubtful. In the first information report, it has been alleged that the informant belonged to scheduled caste category and her husband was suffering ailment. It has been further alleged that all the accused persons did not want the informant along with his family to live in their colony and for the said wishes, earlier they broke the door of the house of the informant for which she made complaint before the District Magistrate. All the accused persons also molested the daughter of the informant i.e. victim and they also harassed the informant and her family for which she has lodged the first information report. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that though the first information report has been lodged against as many as 14 named accused persons including the applicants, only the applicants have been charge-sheeted and other accused persons have been exonerated, which makes the prosecution case doubtful. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the entire prosecution story as unfolded in the first information report appears to be wholly concocted as no date of molestation of the victim and harassment of the informant and her family members by the applicants, was mentioned in the first information report. The applicants are innocent. The real fact is that the applicants and the informant
