It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to previous enmity. As per the allegations made in FIR, there is a dispute between the parties regarding passage in front of the house of informant for which civil litigation between the parties is going on. Due to aforesaid dispute, on 02.09.2019 at about 02:15 a.m., as many as six accused persons including the applicant having lathi and firearm, came on the roof of the house of injured and assaulted him, due to which he sustained injuries. It is further argued that general role has been assigned to all accused persons, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant either in the F.I.R. or in statement of the witnesses. It is further argued that in the medical report, though there is hemorrhagic contusion in left fronto-temporal lobe with thin extradural hematoma is noted of maximum thickness 3 mms along temporal convexity but it is not clear that who is the author of the said injury. The applicant has no criminal history except the present case and is languishing in jail since 03.09.2019. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
