Nadeem v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application allowed for applicant Nadeem involved in an offence punishable under various sections of the IPC, including Sections 395, 420, and 34. Court considered innocence claims and absconding risk.
What did the court decide?
Applicant Nadeem released on bail upon executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40399 of 2018
Applicant :- Nadeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saroj Kumar Dubey,Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.
Contention raised on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Vineet, Rahul, Ashvani, Aditya Singh, Shoaib Alias Babboo have already been admitted to bail by this Court, copies whereof have been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the affidavit filed in support of this bail application. The applicant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 6.5.2018. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail.
Learned AGA has opposed prayer for bail. However, he has not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail given allegations of false implication and lack of criminal history.
Whether the applicant poses a risk of absconding or tampering with witnesses.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nadeem
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Arvind Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/40399/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court