No response was received from the applicants on behalf of the petitioners. The interim order was vacated, and the criminal proceedings were directed to proceed.
Interim order dated 22.05.2003 vacated; trial court directed to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3418 of 2003
Applicant :- Smt. Kamla Gupta & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Applicant :- Preet Pal Singh Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,Rajeev Joshi,Subodh Kumar
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
On the matter being taken up today, no one responds on behalf of the applicants despite repeated calls.
It appears that in this case, the applicants are enjoying interim order granted by this Court and are not interested in pursuing their legal remedy.
In view of above, the instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order dated 22.05.2003 granted by this Court stands vacated.
The trial court is directed to proceed further with the case in accordance with law.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court for compliance forthwith.
Order Date :- 9.1.2019 rkg
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kamla Gupta & Others
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
