Smt. Mridula Agrawal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-judge order dismissed the suspended fraud application due to want of prosecution, as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls. The interim order dated 09.06.2003 stood vacated and the trial court was directed to proceed further.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order dated 09.06.2003 vacated; trial court directed to proceed further.