Dismissed
Jiwan Singh v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/38966/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Brief bail application dismissed as infructuous due to none appearing and likely efflux of time indicating trial concluded or applicant lost interest.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed on grounds of efflux of time and being rendered infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38966 of 2018
¶3
Applicant :- Jiwan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kumar,Ashutosh, Ram Shiromani Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Brij Lal Jha, Suneel Kumar Mishra
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- This is a bail application pending since 2018. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
¶6
- Dismissed accordingly.
¶7
Order Date :- 3.12.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Jiwan Singh
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/38966/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court