Bail application filed by an accused in a dowry/harassment case. The court considered arguments regarding ignition delay and alleged false implication, then allowed the application on a personal bond and two sureties.
Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2780 of 2019
Applicant :- Shahrukh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Yadav,Kuldeep Kumar,Manoj Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohammad Zakir
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
satisfaction of Court concerned with following conditions:
(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii) The applicant will appear before Trial Court on the date fixed.
(iv) The applicant shall report to the Police Station concerned in the first week of each month to show his good conduct and behaviour.
Order Date :- 3.12.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused applicant should be enlarged on bail in a case under Sections-498-A, 328 IPC and D.P. Act.
Shahrukh
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
