A criminal bail application was dismissed. The court held that the applicant's conduct of absconding after prior release on bail and failing to explain his absence extended the trial unnecessarily and did not justify granting bail.
The bail application was rejected due to the applicant's conduct of absconding and failure to justify the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2173 of 2019
Applicant :- Sonu Saket Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Singh,Neeraj Kumar Srivastava,Pankaj Kumar,Rajesh Kumar Roy Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
conduct of applicant, bail application was rejected vide order dated 06.12.2018.
Order Date :- 3.12.2019 Ashish Pd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an accused absconding after being released on bail is entitled to enlargement on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sonu Saket
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
