The High Court rejected a bail application where the accused, falsely implicating the applicant, alleged that the applicant had fired first. The court found the applicant was named in the FIR and the complainant had stated the applicant fired upon him, making it a fit case to reject bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3844 of 2019
Applicant :- Gudda @ Afroz Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sudhir Kumar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail in the crimes under Section 147, 148, 307, 120-B, 34 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gudda @ Afroz
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
