The single-judge court dismissed an old application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pending since 2005 as infructuous due to the efflux of time and the non-appearance of the applicant to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12837 of 2005
Applicant :- Ramesh Pratap Singh And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :-
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
10.12.2019. Service is deemed sufficient.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 Manish Himwan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application filed under Section 482 CrPC should be dismissed due to efflux of time and absence of the applicant.
If the cause of action has expired or the matter has become infructuous, what should be the outcome of the application?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Pratap Singh And Others
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Manish Himwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
