Since the applicant did not appear to press the revision application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to the efflux of time rendering the matter infructuous, the court dismissed the application.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for non-appearance and ineffectiveness due to lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11324 of 2005
Applicant :- Raeesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 12.12.2019 PS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raeesh
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
