Allowed

Manoj Sahni v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2019BAIL/36503/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the applicant accused under Section 307 and 34 IPC. The court permitted release subject to conditions including personal bond, sureties, and instructions to appear for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount subject to specific condit

Manoj Sahni Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 51

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36503 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Manoj Sahni Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Mohan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that it is a no injury case. The matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that he has no criminal antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

¶9

In the event of arrest of the applicant, Manoj Sahni involved in Case Crime No. 101 of 2019 under Section 307, 34 I.P.C., Police Station Pipiganj, District Gorakhpur, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶11

(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶12

(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be

¶13

deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶14

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶15

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶16

The applicant is directed to produce a certified copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶17

In view of aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.

¶18

Order Date :- 18.9.2019 Ujjawal

Manoj Sahni v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Sahni v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Narayan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rohit and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Jawahar Singh and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Harun Vs State of U.P.

Siddharth Gupta and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajat @ Pappan Vs State of U.P.