Iqbal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Bail Application filed by Iqbal seeking bail in a POCSO and rape case involving a minor. The court rejected the bail petition due to the gravity of the offence and the seriousness of the allegations.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected at this stage.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30646 of 2019
Applicant :- Iqbal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashok Kumar Singh Bais
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri A. K. S. Bais, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 102 of 2019, under Sections 376, 506 IPC and section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Deoband, District Saharanpur with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Perusal of the record shows that the girl is a minor aged about 12 years. I have also perused the statement of the girl recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., perusing the averments as contained in the present bail application and looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant facing charges under Sections 376, 506 IPC and POCSO Act.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Iqbal
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Vipin Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/30646/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court