Hon'ble Vipin Sinha, J. rejected an anticipatory bail application under IPC Sections 419 and 420 owing to the seriousness of allegations involving thousands of victims and the gravity of the economic offence. No indulgence was deemed appropriate.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34096 of 2019
Applicant :- Arjun Singh Opposite Party :- State Of Up Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 165 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420 IPC, Police Station Soron, District Kasganj with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the anticipatory bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Perusal of the FIR shows that at least thousands of people of 27 villages were deceived. The offence is made in the FIR with the definition of economic offence.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned FIR and also looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment and the fact as advanced by the learned AGA, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 11.9.2019 Ujjawal
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving large-scale fraud and economic offence.
Whether the gravity of the offence and severity of punishment preclude grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arjun Singh
Vipin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
