Allowed

Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jul 2019BAIL/24839/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to Surendra Singh under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, and 120-B IPC. Court found him fit for bail without opining on merits, subject to personal bond and two sureties, despite opposition by A.G.A.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant to be released on bail upon executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties with specific conditions.

Surendra Singh Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24839 of 2019 Applicant :- Surendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶3

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Surendra Singh in connection with Case Crime No.921 of 2018, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad.

¶4

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that the applicant was not named in the first information report and his name has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Nempal. He further submitted that the applicant is aged about 70 years and is suffering from various age related ailments. He further submitted that he has not received any single penny in the said transactions. He submitted that all the offences are triable by the court of Magistrate. He submitted that the applicant is in jail since 05.10.2018 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶5

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶6

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶7

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶8

Let the applicant Surendra Singh involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶9

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶10

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶11

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶12

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶13

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.7.2019

¶15

R./

Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dileep Baheliya and Another Vs State of U.P.

Hemant Banerjee Vs State of U.P.

Omveer Vs State of U.P.

Istekhar @ Istekar Vs State of U.P.

Suresh Kumar @ Monu Vs State of U.P.

Ankit Kumar Srivastav Vs State of U.P.