Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being mother-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged by Mustafa, his daughter Ashma was married to Rangbaaz about one year ago and Rangbaaz was living in Mumbai, while his daughter was living with her in-laws and since after marriage, she was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of dowry and on 8.10.2017 her father-inlaw informed that his daughter has died due to electric shock and upon arriving there, he found that she was burnt to death after pouring kerosene; that in F.I.R. no specific allegation about demand of dowry was made, however in his statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. by way of improvement, first informant has stated that there was demand of Motorcycle and Rs.50,000/-; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Motorcycle and Rs.50,000/- allegedly demanded, as dowry; that deceased got a severe electric shock, by which she was thrown on the ground, due to shock and sustained head injury, resulting in her death; that as per post mortem report she died due to solitary head injury on back of skull with fracture of bones in base of skull and there is no other anti mortem injury on her person; that neither any kerosene oil smell nor any burn injuries were found on the person of deceased; that applicant is an old lady aged about 60 years; that co-accused Mohd. Arman @ Lala and Sanno @ Rehamatunisha ( Jeth and Jethani ) have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide orders dated 4.9.2018 and 31.7.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.33455 of 2018 and 28451 of 2018, copies filed at Annexure Nos.8 and 9; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that she will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 18.10.2017.
