Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being father-in-law of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged by Ganesh Gond, his 27 years old daughter Gudiya was married to Chandan in the year 2011 and on 7.9.2018 Chandan informed on phone that Gudiya is seriously ill and when he reached her sasural at about 8:00 a.m., he found dead body of his daughter lying in the room, who died due to hanging; that in F.I.R. there is no whisper of demand of dowry or cruelty in connection therewith; that in statements under section 161 Cr.P.C., first informant as well as his wife have stated that since after one year of marriage deceased was being treated with cruelty by her husband Chandan Gond and motherin-law demanding a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Rs.1,00,000/allegedly demanded, as dowry; that as per post mortem report death of deceased did take place due to asphyxia as a result of anti mortem hanging and there is no other anti mortem injury on her person, except ligature mark; that case of applicant is distinguishable from husband of deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 15.11.2018.