Dismissed

Naseem and 4 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2019A482/45916/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for quashing proceedings, the applicant sought extensive relief but withdrew major submissions, offering only a procedural direction for hearing bail. The court dismissed the quashing prayer but allowed a conditional surrender and bail consideration within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the charge-sheet and stay of proceedings dismissed. Surrender within 30 days entitles the applicant to bail consideration.

Naseem and 4 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 66

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 45916 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Naseem And 4 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Adil Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.

¶5

This application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the charge-sheet dated 25.7.2018 as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case no. 10673 of 2018 (State vs. Naseeem and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 135 of 2018, u/s 147, 452, 323, 324 IPC, P.S. Nauganwan Sadat, District Amroha.

¶6

At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding as have been made in the application nor is inclined to press the prayer seeking stay of the summoning order and the proceeding. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants is that the hearing of the bail application may be done on the same day.

¶7

Heard learned AGA and perused the record.

¶8

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants the application so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding and so far as it relates to seeking stay of the proceeding, stands dismissed.

¶9

However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

¶10

For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶11

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.

¶12

Order Date :- 16.12.2019 Dhirendra/

Naseem and 4 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naseem and 4 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yunus Ansari and 4 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Another

Neeraj and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Smt. Noor Jahan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Ors.

Naieem and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pintoo Agrawal and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Union Bank of India Vs State of U.P. and Anr.