Virendra and 2 Others v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40501 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40501 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40501 of 2019
Applicant :- Virendra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Digvijay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant does not wish to press the present application as he has not challenged the summoning order nor he has enclosed the copy of the same on record, therefore, the present application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh application challenging the summoning order.
Prayer made for is bona fide. Accordingly, the same is allowed.
The present application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.
Certified copies of the impugned first information report and order shall be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photo copies of the same to be kept on record.
(Manju Rani Chauhan, J.)
Order Date :- 28.11.2019
Sushil/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Section 482 application should be allowed or dismissed when the applicant did not press the matter.
Virendra And 2 Others
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court