This is an expired section 482 application for summoning witnesses. The court dismissed it as not pressed because the applicant did not challenge the summoning order nor enclose its copy on record, but allowed the prayer on merits and returned copies of documents.
Prayer made is allowed; copies of complaint and order returned to applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40368 of 2019
Applicant :- Sanjay Kapur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant does not wish to press the present application as he has not challenged the summoning order nor he has enclosed the copy of the same on record, therefore, the present application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh application challenging the summoning order.
Prayer made for is bona fide. Accordingly, the same is allowed.
The present application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.
Certified copies of the impugned first information report and order shall be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photo copies of the same to be kept on record.
(Manju Rani Chauhan, J.)
Order Date :- 28.11.2019
Sushil/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present application can be pressed without challenging the summoning order and enclosing its copy.
Whether the prayer made in the application is bona fide.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kapur
State of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
